Saturday, June 16, 2007

Stay of execution for dogs

Reverse onus has definitely been struck down! But it`s repeated in this article that the onus is on the dog owner?Who`s not doing their homework? Check out the Sarnia Observer.

Stay of execution for dogs;
Purported pit bulls will be assessed by local vet
CATHY DOBSON
Local News
Wednesday, June 13, 2007

A mother and her three puppies at the centre of a growing protest overprovincial pit bull legislation have been granted a stay-of-execution. City solicitor Brian Knott confirmed that Sarnia's legal departmentplanned to ask the local animal shelter to euthanize the dogs today.

But a request from the owner's lawyer to allow more time for a vet to assess their breed prompted the city to grant at least another week.

"Had we not heard from anyone, they would have been euthanized Wednesday," Knott said. "But we're providing the owners more time togive us more information."

The dogs were seized by Sarnia animal control officers June 6.

They belong to Brian Edwards Jr. and his girlfriend, Cassie Bates, who say they were told to hand them over or be charged because the dogs are not licensed and the female is not spayed.

Under Ontario's pit bull law, owners of any dogs judged to be pitbulls must register their pets, muzzle them in public and spay or neuter them.

Brian Edwards Sr., who has taken up his son's cause, said Brian Jr.doesn't believe his dogs are pitbulls and that's why they weren't registered or fixed.

His family has retained a Toronto lawyer who volunteered to take on the case without payment.

"We need him to get the dogs back," Edwards Sr. said. "This law isjust unbelievable. It's too vague and too unfair."

The law does not clearly define a pit bull and places the onus on the dog owner to prove it's not, he said.

"We hope a vet will look at our dogs and confirm what we already know."

The Edwards family is organizing rallies for Friday, starting at noon, to run simultaneously in front of city hall, MPP Caroline Di Cocco's office and the local humane society, where the dogs are being held.

"I'm an old hippy and I believe in protest," said Edwards Sr.

Since the city seized the dogs and he spoke to the media, Edwards Sr.says he's received at least 100 supportive calls from Ontario and Michigan.

He wants to hold a march at Queen's Park this summer and attract thousands of animal lovers.

Meanwhile, the manager of the local animal shelter says she and her staff are caught in the middle.

"We are simply housing these dogs at the request of the city," TamiHolmes said. "But we are getting blamed for all of this and being judged the executioners."

Her office received a death threat from someone upset that the dogs would be euthanized and regular humane society supporters are angry, Holmes said.

"It's just infuriating because we have nothing to do with it. We are neutral," she said.

The city is also caught in the middle, Knott said.

"This is provincial legislation we're attempting to enforce."

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm glad there is so much attention being draw to this. Maybe we can flush some things further out into the open.

I have more to say on this I think.. But right now, my head is being cleaved in two by a sneak attack head ache. SOoo.. I'll leave it with "SAVE THE PUPPIES! PUT DOWN THE REAL MONSTERS! ARRROOOOO!!!"
(eh.. I'm not really advocating the euthanasia of officials, it just went with the whole theme... maybe you could just mock them and laugh at their stupidity)

Conners said...

Gee, it's so frustrating because they are being blamed and they are staying neutral and the city is caught in the middle. How sad for those people.
Like what about the pups? How neutral can you be when you are going to murder innocent pups and why were thy brought in for in the first place. Now THEY are frustrated??? OH BROTHER!
What about the couple that own then? How do they feel? Obviously stong enough to get a good lawyer involved and fight for what they believe.
BUT sharon, you've given me an idea. How about reporters being given that if they write untruths, their penalty is euthenization. I'm sure we would get a whole different type of reporting going on with facts rather than fiction.
What do you think of that idea? They would tread so lightly to make sure they have their stories straight. LOL